http://lifeisgrand.disqus.com/enThu, 01 Nov 2007 05:34:14 -0000http://paulmwatson.com/journal/2007/10/31/websense-goes-for-feedburner/#comment-1284764No, I've got IT to look into it John. They will contact WIT and sort it out. Our project depends on it, these feeds aren't just our personal dalliances.Paul WatsonThu, 01 Nov 2007 05:34:14 -0000http://paulmwatson.com/journal/2007/10/31/websense-goes-for-feedburner/#comment-1284763So that explains why all my live bookmarks won't load. God damn you websense! So are we stuck with that ridiculous filter for good now?John ButlerThu, 01 Nov 2007 05:25:39 -0000http://paulmwatson.com/journal/2007/10/31/websense-goes-for-feedburner/#comment-1284762I just got off the phone with WebSense, and they claim that FeedBurner is classified as "information technology", not "sex". (That there couldn't be any one classification is a separate issue.) They suggest that either (a) your URL database is corrupt, or (b) out of date. The recommended resolution (per Websense) is to contact them and ensure your database of URLs is up to date.<br><br>Hope that helps,<br><br>Rick Klau<br>Google (former VP/publisher services, FeedBurner)Rick KlauWed, 31 Oct 2007 19:42:31 -0000http://paulmwatson.com/journal/2007/10/31/websense-goes-for-feedburner/#comment-1284761I'm really not surprised with this sort of net nannying. We have it much *much* worse at our work :\jufemaizWed, 31 Oct 2007 19:11:11 -0000