<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Life is grand - Latest Comments in The evolutionary knot</title><link>http://lifeisgrand.disqus.com/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2006 14:17:00 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: The evolutionary knot</title><link>http://paulmwatson.com/journal/2006/02/23/the-evolutionary-knot/#comment-1279771</link><description>hehe, nice one Stone. Glad I am not the only one who has thought of this. You know what they say, great minds think alike, and fools seldom differ.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Paul Watson</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2006 14:17:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The evolutionary knot</title><link>http://paulmwatson.com/journal/2006/02/23/the-evolutionary-knot/#comment-1279773</link><description>While I don't believe in macro-evolution, I have always found that argument funny for exactly the same reasons. Heck, one time I was playing devil's advocate for evolution with a student here at UCSD. When he brought up the lego example, I just pulled out my headphones and said "I didn't arrange them like this."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;He didn't really have a response.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;That's when I let him know that I was only playing devil's advocate.  I know. I'm mean. :-p</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">David Stone</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2006 14:17:00 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>