<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Life is grand - Latest Comments in Solarwind trees</title><link>http://lifeisgrand.disqus.com/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 10:17:27 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Solarwind trees</title><link>http://paulmwatson.com/journal/2008/03/03/solarwind-trees/#comment-1285176</link><description>Sure but the vine configuration shows just one side of a house to light and wind and there is overlap too. Wind may pass through a tree configuration better too and there would always be a side facing the sun.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;As for the hokey aspect, I agree but the vine config looks pretty hokey too :)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">paulmwatson</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 10:17:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Solarwind trees</title><link>http://paulmwatson.com/journal/2008/03/03/solarwind-trees/#comment-1285177</link><description>A tree would end up having leaves covering other leaves from wind and light. And honestly I don't think we need to try too hard trying to make these things look like the "real deal", it would look even more hokey. I like the ivy look.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Arvin Bautista</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 09:42:46 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>