<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Life is grand - Latest Comments in Photography on a Mac</title><link>http://lifeisgrand.disqus.com/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sun, 30 Sep 2007 07:06:29 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Photography on a Mac</title><link>http://paulmwatson.com/journal/2007/04/14/photography-on-a-mac/#comment-1281958</link><description>Thanks Matt, I'll give that a try</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Paul Watson</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 30 Sep 2007 07:06:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Photography on a Mac</title><link>http://paulmwatson.com/journal/2007/04/14/photography-on-a-mac/#comment-1281957</link><description>Hi Paul,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;In the meantime, I found out you can get iPhoto to rebuild its thumbnail cache and do other library repairs by holding down apple+option(alt) while you launch iPhoto (keep holding until it starts up.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;This will give you a dialogue box with options of what to repair.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Not sure why they had to make the function so obscure...</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Matt Musselman</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 29 Sep 2007 22:36:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Photography on a Mac</title><link>http://paulmwatson.com/journal/2007/04/14/photography-on-a-mac/#comment-1281956</link><description>Aperture is not just too expensive it is also a long-term nightmare that I don't want to invest in. If it cost $5 I wouldn't buy it.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I don't take 100s of photos a day, my collection is from several years of taking digital photos. I mostly shoot on weekends and yes, then I'll take a few hundred in two or so days. Not a lot really, many DSLR owners will be doing the same.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Paul Watson</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 12 Aug 2007 12:49:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Photography on a Mac</title><link>http://paulmwatson.com/journal/2007/04/14/photography-on-a-mac/#comment-1281955</link><description>If you've got 500GB of files and take hundreds of pics a day then you must be a professional or someone with way too much time on your hands. Is 200 quid a lot for an app in your position???</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Paul Kabowsky</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 11 Aug 2007 19:27:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Photography on a Mac</title><link>http://paulmwatson.com/journal/2007/04/14/photography-on-a-mac/#comment-1281954</link><description>True but iPhoto doesn't handle my photo library size. It abstracts but doesn't do a very good job of it on large datasets.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If iPhoto cached better it would be a usable tool even for me. But it doesn't.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Paul Watson</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2007 14:50:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Photography on a Mac</title><link>http://paulmwatson.com/journal/2007/04/14/photography-on-a-mac/#comment-1281953</link><description>Paul,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I think you are fundamentally missing the point.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Tools like iPhoto or Aperture, etc... provide Library Management as well photo touching/metatdata...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The whole point of applications like iLife (including iTunes) is to abstract the filesystem (your not supposed to delve down there).  Im afraid that you are so used to living in Windows (Explorer metaphor) that you are struggling to realise that you need to 'manage' everything through the application.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If you use iTunes it works in a similar way...</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Suresh Kumar</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2007 13:16:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Photography on a Mac</title><link>http://paulmwatson.com/journal/2007/04/14/photography-on-a-mac/#comment-1281952</link><description>Thanks mica. I just tried xee and it caches already viewed files nicely but it doesn't preload. So trying to flick through a directory of images is dead slow the first time. It also has no thumbnail view which is pretty useful.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Paul Watson</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2007 17:09:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Photography on a Mac</title><link>http://paulmwatson.com/journal/2007/04/14/photography-on-a-mac/#comment-1281951</link><description>xee?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mica</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2007 06:52:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Photography on a Mac</title><link>http://paulmwatson.com/journal/2007/04/14/photography-on-a-mac/#comment-1281950</link><description>I don't think it is a particularly well designed app. Slow and full of unneeded features. I actually haven't used it since I switched to OS X so I'll give it a try again, thanks for the reminder.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Paul Watson</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 15 Apr 2007 05:57:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Photography on a Mac</title><link>http://paulmwatson.com/journal/2007/04/14/photography-on-a-mac/#comment-1281949</link><description>What's wrong with using Photoshop's File Browser?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jim</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 14 Apr 2007 23:38:30 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>