<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Life is grand - Latest Comments in On FaceBook</title><link>http://lifeisgrand.disqus.com/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 Jan 2008 05:08:51 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: On FaceBook</title><link>http://paulmwatson.com/journal/2007/08/24/on-facebook/#comment-1284393</link><description>Bored with Facebook?  Get active with Cinnaminta.&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.cinnaminta.com/en/boredwithfacebook.htm" rel="nofollow"&gt;www.cinnaminta.com/en/boredwithfacebook.htm&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">wikkid_weazle</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 19 Jan 2008 05:08:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: On FaceBook</title><link>http://paulmwatson.com/journal/2007/08/24/on-facebook/#comment-1284392</link><description>Good points Paul, you articulated a bunch of things I've been trying to say . . . The value is almost entirely short-term, which in reality, was the big question I was asking with my post to begin with: Will Facebook survive for long, or will it be supplanted by yet another social network?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Noah Brier</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 26 Aug 2007 18:37:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: On FaceBook</title><link>http://paulmwatson.com/journal/2007/08/24/on-facebook/#comment-1284391</link><description>I think the current trends are largely due to peoples vanity :)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Chris Gallagher</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 26 Aug 2007 06:22:03 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>