http://lifeisgrand.disqus.com/enFri, 25 Jan 2008 18:12:59 -0000http://paulmwatson.com/journal/2008/01/22/google-readers-waterfall-feature/#comment-1285142The world .diesel phamFri, 25 Jan 2008 18:12:59 -0000http://paulmwatson.com/journal/2008/01/22/google-readers-waterfall-feature/#comment-1285141It is part of a larger discussion taking place in the RSSsphere. A buggy Google Reader just highlights the problems of being a slave to unread counts.<br><br>Google Reader shouldn't change (just fix the bug) but it would be nice if it allowed me to specify which feeds I want to see unread counts on and which to just let slide by on the river of news.paulmwatsonTue, 22 Jan 2008 14:26:22 -0000http://paulmwatson.com/journal/2008/01/22/google-readers-waterfall-feature/#comment-1285140So wait, a buggy Google Reader == The Tyranny of Emailish RSS?<br>I don't want to think of feeds as emails (and don't use my email program as a feedreader for that reason...), but i fail to see how you've made an argument here...Shog9Tue, 22 Jan 2008 12:43:11 -0000