<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Life is grand - Latest Comments in Future of links</title><link>http://lifeisgrand.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://lifeisgrand.disqus.com/future_of_links/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Jun 2006 13:46:37 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Future of links</title><link>http://paulmwatson.com/journal/2006/06/14/future-of-links/#comment-1280556</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Paul, thanks for commenting on my article.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The interoperability and microformats are just part of the story. You still need the browser to interpret them and be intelligent. We are currently observing a huge surge in web services. Sort of like Ecipse plugins if you know what I mean. Lots and lots of stuff that does not quite interoprate. The browser has a chance to be the glue between the services. And I agree that it needs to be open and pluggable, 100%. This is what we are trying to do at adaptiveblue.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Cheers,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Alex&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Alex Iskold</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 16 Jun 2006 13:46:37 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>