<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Life is grand - Latest Comments in find :first vs. find :all in ActiveResource</title><link>http://lifeisgrand.disqus.com/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 04:50:21 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: find :first vs. find :all in ActiveResource</title><link>http://paulmwatson.com/journal/2008/01/22/find-first-vs-find-all-in-activeresource/#comment-1285139</link><description>Does Post.find(:one) work as expected?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jason Madigan</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 04:50:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: find :first vs. find :all in ActiveResource</title><link>http://paulmwatson.com/journal/2008/01/22/find-first-vs-find-all-in-activeresource/#comment-1285138</link><description>hehe, the naming does remind me of Microsoft circa the '90s. And Rails doesn't have a good reason why they call it Active*, they just do.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">paulmwatson</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 03:59:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: find :first vs. find :all in ActiveResource</title><link>http://paulmwatson.com/journal/2008/01/22/find-first-vs-find-all-in-activeresource/#comment-1285137</link><description>Anyone else find the "Active" prefix used in the names of Rails components a grating reminder of a certain Microsoft theme from the '90s?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;(yeah, yeah, i'm sure Rails has a much better reason for using it than MS did, but it doesn't matter, i'll always associate it with COM BS, the way i'll always associate *Gator with shady adware)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Shog9</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2008 20:46:48 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>