-
Website
http://paulmwatson.com/journal -
Original page
http://paulmwatson.com/journal/2006/08/25/canons-400d-digital-slr-camera/ -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
aidanf
1 comment · 3 points
-
keithbohanna
1 comment · 1 points
-
martinmurphy
1 comment · 1 points
-
jufemaiz
1 comment · 1 points
-
lxsg
1 comment · 1 points
-
-
Popular Threads
For someone wanting a range like that on a Canon 350D or 400D the answer might be to buy only the body and equip it with a third party lens such as the Sigma 18-125mm. I have one of these and while it isn't top quality glass it is affordable and a fair choice as a single lens for an entry level user.
So if Nikons feel better to you then go for the D80. I'd still go for the D80 even with the 400D features.
I found the 400D images Fantastic from todays outing. Just about to get ready to go to new zealand with it and I cant wait to test it out further. I got the twin lens kit and its pretty sweet. Perhaps this size thing comes from those using 30D and 5d or that we have quite a few large hands photographers out there :)
My choice in getting it?
Price, lenses and the dust anti shake was a big deal from choosing this or the d80. also the fact that the D80 is no where to be seen...!!
otherwise Im happy and I hope whatever you guys have or will get will be happy with that choice.
I had a eos 350 d and found that the RAW images i took were not that sharp (shooting from a tripod) a bit blurry. I like to know if the results are better on a 400d. anybody? Or. Where can i find a review?
Thanks.
I'm one of the entry-level buyers. Do you still stand by your recommendation of the Nikon D80 over the Canon 400D?
I am looking to get into serious photography. Only for hobby though. Would it be a good move to get the Nikon D50 to start off or should I start with D70 or D80?
Stan.