<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Life is grand - Latest Comments in An end to Quicksilver?</title><link>http://lifeisgrand.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://lifeisgrand.disqus.com/an_end_to_quicksilver/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2007 05:13:27 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: An end to Quicksilver?</title><link>http://paulmwatson.com/journal/2007/10/26/an-end-to-quicksilver/#comment-1284758</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'm about to drive to the local mac supplier and pick up a copy.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;why?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;-DTrace. As an engineer this is a huge new step. The benefits for applications are downstream but it think they will be far reaching.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;-Performance improvements. Each Mac OS has improved on the same hardware. and spotlight is seemingly a lot more usable.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;-I'm a sucker for upgrades&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The best and most compressive review by far is the on at arstechnica&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://arstechnica.com/reviews/os/mac-os-x-10-5.ars/1" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://arstechnica.com/reviews/os/mac-os-x-10-5.ars/1"&gt;http://arstechnica.com/revi...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;There is a discussion of the Qucksilver / spotlight issue on page 15.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">neil c</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2007 05:13:27 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>