http://lifeisgrand.disqus.com/enSun, 10 Feb 2008 17:16:55 -0000http://paulmwatson.com/journal/2008/02/10/aggregating-application-interactions/#comment-1285165Sadly not, Shog. Feed readers are still very much only "title, link and description" aware. Some understand enclosures but any other elements in the item are pretty much ignored.paulmwatsonSun, 10 Feb 2008 17:16:55 -0000http://paulmwatson.com/journal/2008/02/10/aggregating-application-interactions/#comment-1285164That reminds me of something... Back when i first read the ATOM spec, i though it sounded like a great way to implement two-way communication: GET a list of items, POST new ones, PUT modifications... it all seemed so... nice.<br><br>Then i realized that the feed readers out there didn't even bother rendering everything in each , to say nothing of any sort of support for adding new ones. What a waste. Any idea if that's changed...?Shog9Sun, 10 Feb 2008 16:30:07 -0000